Autistic childrenÕs understanding of false belief: Studies based on computerized animation task
نویسندگان
چکیده
The first purpose of the studies reported was to compare the ability of autistic children in understanding false belief with the corresponding abilities of normal or mentally retarded children. Unexpected location tasks adapted from the SallyAnne false belief tasks were used in experiment 1. Autistic children performed worse than normal children and the mentally retarded children, but the difference in performance between the autistic and the mentally retarded children was not significant. Similar results emerged when the unexpected content tasks adapted from the Smarties tasks were used in
منابع مشابه
Does the autistic child have a metarepresentational deficit?
This study examines the claim that autistic children lack a "theory of mind" because of an inability to metarepresent. We argue that if autistic children have a "metarepresentational" deficit in Leslie's (1987, 1988) sense of the term, then they should have difficulty not only with mental representations such as false beliefs, but also with external representations such as photographs. Autistic...
متن کاملDrawing insight from pictures: the development of concepts of false drawing and false belief in children with deafness, normal hearing, and autism.
Theory-of-mind concepts in children with deafness, autism, and normal development (N = 154) were examined in three experiments using a set of standard inferential false-belief tasks and matched sets of tasks involving false drawings. Results of all three experiments replicated previously published findings by showing that primary school children with deafness or autism, aged 6 to 13 years, scor...
متن کاملCompetence and performance in false belief understanding: A comparison of autistic and normal 3-year-old children
Using a standard prediction of action task, we nd that normally developing 3-yearold children successfully take into account a protagonist’s false belief when asked a ‘look rst’ question. When asked this same question in a true belief scenario, 3-yearolds also correctly predict a protagonist’s action even though in this case the correct answer is the second (full) location rather than the rs...
متن کاملPAPER False-belief understanding in 2.5-year-olds: evidence from two novel verbal spontaneous-response tasks
Recent research indicates that toddlers and infants succeed at various non-verbal spontaneous-response false-belief tasks; here we asked whether toddlers would also succeed at verbal spontaneous-response false-belief tasks that imposed significant linguistic demands. We tested 2.5-year-olds using two novel tasks: a preferential-looking task in which children listened to a false-belief story whi...
متن کاملFalse-belief understanding in 2.5-year-olds: evidence from two novel verbal spontaneous-response tasks.
Recent research indicates that toddlers and infants succeed at various non-verbal spontaneous-response false-belief tasks; here we asked whether toddlers would also succeed at verbal spontaneous-response false-belief tasks that imposed significant linguistic demands. We tested 2.5-year-olds using two novel tasks: a preferential-looking task in which children listened to a false-belief story whi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001